A recent report from QueerTech, in collaboration with Abacus Data, has unveiled a concerning gap in the inclusivity of AI systems for LGBTQ+ users in Canada. With nearly 20% of AI developers admitting they’ve never considered safety for LGBTQ+ individuals, the findings raise significant questions about the current state and future of AI development in the country.
## The State of AI Inclusivity
The QueerTech report paints a stark picture of the AI landscape. Less than half of AI developers believe their products adequately address the needs of LGBTQ+ users, a stark contrast to the 65% who feel their systems meet the general population’s needs. This discrepancy highlights a critical oversight in AI development, where inclusivity is often sidelined.
The data, gathered from 100 AI product developers across various roles, reveals not only ignorance but also hostility. Alarmingly, 11% of responses were overtly homophobic or transphobic. These attitudes reflect a broader issue within the tech community, where diversity and inclusion are often seen as secondary to product functionality.
## Implications for the Tech Community
AI Minister Evan Solomon emphasized the consequences of narrow development teams. “If AI is built around narrow teams and narrow use cases, [by] people with narrow experiences, they will give narrow results,” he stated. This narrowness not only limits the potential of AI technologies but also risks alienating entire communities.
The report also highlights the lack of formal processes to address bias, with 43% of developers reporting minimal to no efforts in this area. This lack of organizational support for equitable representation is a significant barrier to inclusive AI development.
For engineers and product managers, these findings underscore the importance of advocating for diverse perspectives in development teams. Without them, AI systems risk perpetuating existing biases and failing to serve all users effectively.
## Challenges and Opportunities
The challenges in creating inclusive AI are multifaceted. Developers cite insufficient resources, competing priorities, and difficulty measuring ROI as top barriers. Yet, as Microsoft’s David Beauchemin pointed out, the return on investment for inclusive AI lies in consumer trust. “You can’t build a tool that only serves a portion of people or … you’ll lose the trust,” he warned.
For founders and VCs, this signals a crucial opportunity. Investing in diversity and inclusion is not just ethically sound but also a strategic move to build trust and credibility in AI products.
## Looking Forward
The QueerTech report serves as a wake-up call for the Canadian tech industry. As AI continues to evolve, the need for inclusive practices becomes increasingly urgent. For those in the field, this means prioritizing diverse teams and inclusive design processes. It’s not just about avoiding negative PR; it’s about building technology that genuinely serves and respects all users.
As the industry moves forward, the challenge will be to turn awareness into action. For engineers and founders, the next step is clear: push for comprehensive inclusion strategies and ensure that AI development reflects the diversity of its users. This is not just a moral imperative but a business necessity.




















